Bloomberg Law: Visa, Mastercard to Cut Fees, Let Retailers Reject Certain Cards
Trade groups such as the Merchants Payments Coalition came out against the proposed settlement, arguing that premium cards like the Sapphire Reserve have become so popular in recent years that it would be impossible not to accept them. ... As part of their opposition to the deal, the Merchants Payments Coalition said that Visa and Mastercard only agreed to limit the portion of the fees that they pass on to lenders — not the fees they keep for themselves. “The minuscule reduction proposed in the settlement on bank fees could still allow Visa and Mastercard to be able to raise their own fees without any limits,” said Jennifer Hatcher, an executive committee member for the MPC. “All of the supposed merchant and consumer savings could easily be canceled by Visa and Mastercard increasing their fees.”
READ MORE +
Credit Unions Today: Major Card Networks’ New Deal With Merchants May Undercut Marshall-Durbin Momentum
Merchant groups are already pushing back, arguing the updated deal still fails to resolve the concerns raised by U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie of Brooklyn, whose approval is required after she rejected the previous accord in June 2024. ... These groups, including the National Retail Federation and the Merchants Payments Coalition, say businesses would still pay too much, including to accept the popular rewards cards that dominate the card market.
READ MORE +
Reuters: Visa, Mastercard reach $38 billion swipe fee settlement, draw opposition
Doug Kantor, general counsel of the National Association of Convenience Stores, countered that the settlement doesn't give banks an incentive to lower rates they charge, but lets Visa and Mastercard "without any limitation" raise their own. "Merchants ought to be able to negotiate and get prices set with different banks, but this settlement prohibits that," Kantor, also a member of the Merchants Payments Coalition's executive committee, said in an interview.
READ MORE +
Financial Times: Visa and Mastercard forge deal to end long-term dispute with merchants
Some major trade bodies including the National Retail Federation and the Merchants Payments Coalition criticised the proposed settlement, saying it does not go far enough to address their concerns over swipe fees. ... Both groups said they were pushing for Congress to pass the Credit Card Competition Act, which the Merchants Payments Coalition estimates will save merchants $17bn a year by making it easier for large banks to process credit card payments on alternative card networks.
READ MORE +
Harlem World: Visa And Mastercard Settle Swipe Fee Lawsuit
The Merchants Payments Coalition criticized the fee reduction as “minimal,” noting that Visa and Mastercard could still raise fees without limitation once temporary reductions expire. The group also argued that merchants have “no choice” but to accept rewards cards, which constitute 85% of all issued cards.
READ MORE +
CSP Daily News: Retailers oppose latest interchange fee settlement offer
“Achieving a settlement that works to reverse current illegal and anticompetitive practices of Visa and Mastercard should be straightforward, but this attempt fails once again and should be rejected,” said Jennifer Hatcher, chief public policy officer at FMI—the Food Industry Association and a member of the executive committee at the Merchant Payments Coalition.
READ MORE +
Supermarket News: Retailers oppose latest interchange fee settlement offer
“Achieving a settlement that works to reverse current illegal and anticompetitive practices of Visa and Mastercard should be straightforward, but this attempt fails once again and should be rejected,” said Jennifer Hatcher, chief public policy officer at FMI—the Food Industry Association and a member of the executive committee at the Merchant Payments Coalition.
READ MORE +
Progressive Grocer: Visa, Mastercard Offer Revised Swipe Fee Settlement
“Achieving a settlement that works to reverse current illegal and anticompetitive practices of Visa and Mastercard should be straightforward, but this attempt fails once again and should be rejected,” noted Jennifer Hatcher, executive committee member of the Merchants Payments Coalition and chief public policy officer at Arlington, Va.-based FMI — the Food Industry Association. “The courts have emphatically rejected these settlements twice, but now the card industry is trying again to get legal protection while offering little in return to merchants. Under this proposal, Visa and Mastercard would get to keep fixing swipe fees while Main Street businesses and customers would pay the price.”
READ MORE +
Payments Dive: Visa, Mastercard reach legal pact with merchants
Big merchant trade groups, including the National Retail Federation and the Merchant Payments Coalition, criticized the settlement as unsatisfactory. “This is a bad deal,” said Doug Kantor, who is general counsel for the National Association of Convenience Stores as well as an executive committee member for the Merchants Payments Coalition. “It’s not much different than the deal last year that the judge threw out,” he said in a Monday interview. Kantor contended that many standard, non-premium cards already have interchange rates lower than the 1.25% cap. Generally, the card networks will still be able to revise their fees to offset any reductions dictated by the agreement, he said. Overall, he argued that the banks still won’t have sufficient incentive to compete in the credit card marketplace under the new settlement.
READ MORE +
Digital Transactions: A Deal Looks No Closer In Merchants’ Long-Running Legal Battle Over Acceptance Fees
Merchant opposition to the expected settlement offer is driven by the networks’ failure to create a payments ecosystem that enables true pricing competition concerning acceptance costs, merchant groups argue. “That’s the central problem, and the settlement does not address it,” says Doug Kantor, a Merchants Payments Coalition executive committee member and general counsel for the National Association of Convenience Stores. “[The central problem] remains the reason why the lawsuit was brought in the first place.” The MPC, NACS, and the National Retail Federation issued statements Sunday opposing the expected settlement and calling for it to be rejected by the court.
READ MORE +